
 |

Tom Stevens' Blog Post Reveals Him to be First-Rate Louse
By Diana Hsieh @ 4:54 AM 
Paul and I just finished four lovely days of hiking in Acadia, Maine. (I'll blog some about that later today, if I can.) We've had not-so-great internet access, however, so I'm a bit behind on some internet-dependent tasks, including blogging. However, tomorrow I'll start a daily (but short) blog post on OCON.
However, I want to mention that Dr. Tom Stevens -- of the so-called Objectivist Party has written the most absurdly offensive blog post possible: Farrah Fawcett's E-Mail Reveals Ayn Rand Thought Their Sharing The Same Birth Date Had Significance. I won't pain you by quoting the pompous blog post, but basically he accuses Ayn Rand of relying faith, superstition, and mysticism because she apparently made an offhand remark to Farrah Fawcett about them sharing a birthday.
Sheesh.Labels: False Friends of Objectivism, Libertarianism
|
| |
E-mail Diana Hsieh
PermaLink ( )
Comments (New Page)
|
|
| Tuesday, June 30, 2009 |

 |

Good News on Free Speech
By Diana Hsieh @ 12:01 AM 
Wow, this news from the Institute for Justice is surprisingly hopeful:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: June 29,2009
First Amendment Blockbuster at the Supreme Court:
Court Orders New Arguments in Citizens United, Majority Appears Poised To Strike Down Electioneering Communications and Corporate Speech Bans
First-Ever Study of Impact on Nonprofits Demonstrates Need To Rein in Out-of-Control Speech Regulations
Arlington, Va.--The U.S. Supreme Court today ordered a new round of oral arguments in Citizens United v. FEC, the "Hillary: The Movie" case. The Court wants parties to address whether Austin v. Michigan, a case that bans certain political speech by corporations, including nonprofit corporations such as Citizens United, should be overturned. The Court also wants to consider whether part of McConnell v. FEC, upholding the so-called "electioneering communications" ban in McCain-Feingold, should likewise be overturned and the ban struck down entirely.
"The Court has set up a blockbuster case about Americans' First Amendment rights to join together and speak freely about politics," said Steve Simpson, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Citizens United v. FEC. "A majority of the High Court appears to recognize the grave threat to free speech posed by both the electioneering communications ban in McCain-Feingold and the ban on corporate political speech. This case could mark a significant advance for First Amendment rights and will have major implications for state laws nationwide."
Indeed, a study released today shows the critical need to rein in speech regulations that have flourished since the Court upheld the electioneering communications ban in McConnell. At least 15 states have electioneering communications laws, and in many cases those laws regulate even more speech by more groups than the federal ban. Indeed, just last month, in response to a lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice, a federal judge struck down Florida's law. He noted that "no court has ever upheld such a sweeping regulation of political speech."
The study is the first ever to examine the impact of speech regulations on the kind of nonprofit corporations at issue in Austin. The study shows that these laws impose on nonprofit groups a heavy regulatory burden for their speech and most lack the resources to comply. "Locking Up Political Speech: How Electioneering Communications Laws Burden Free Speech and Civic Engagement" by political scientist Dr. Michael Munger of Duke University is available at http://www.ij.org/citizensunited.
"Since McCain-Feingold, campaign finance regulation has exploded, leaving practically no room for free speech about politics," said Bill Maurer, an attorney with the Institute for Justice and lead counsel for the Institute on its Citizens United brief. "With each new regulation, more citizens are shut out of the political process. That is why it is essential for the Court to revisit and indeed overturn Austin and McConnell."
The Citizens United case came about because the Federal Election Commission banned the airing of "Hillary: The Movie," produced by the nonprofit Citizens United, on cable TV and required the group to "name names" of the film's backers by disclosing to the government detailed personal information about donors if the group ran TV ads for the film. At oral argument, justices appeared concerned that if the government could ban corporate-funded films about candidates, it could also ban books. Revisiting Austin and McConnell allows the Court to fully consider whether speech regulation has gone too far.
"The Court will now squarely confront the inevitable consequences of regulating political speech: If the government can ban ads, it can ban movies and books as well," said Simpson. "But we don't ban books in America. Once you start regulating political speech, there is no place to stop. This is exactly why the First Amendment forbids government from controlling and limiting speech in the first place."
Simpson continued, "It takes money to speak effectively, so the right to free speech must include the right to spend money and raise money to make that speech heard."
"Reconsidering Austin and McConnell is a critical start to fixing what is wrong with campaign finance regulation, but it should not be the end," said Simpson. "The root of the problem stretches back 30 years to Buckley: the belief that some speech deserves government regulation simply because it advocates for one candidate over another. In America, we have the right to try to convince fellow citizens how to vote. It's called 'political speech,' and it's exactly what the First Amendment was designed to protect. We cannot fully protect First Amendment rights until the Court does away with the distinction between 'good' speech and 'bad' speech altogether." All my hopes are with Steve Simpson and the other good folks at the Institute for Justice! I am so grateful for their hard work hard to protect our rights -- and for this ray of sunshine in the bleak landscape of American politics today.Labels: Free Speech
|
| |
E-mail Diana Hsieh
PermaLink ( )
Comments (New Page)
|
|
| Sunday, June 28, 2009 |

 |

Recap #48
By Diana Hsieh @ 2:00 PM 
This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM: Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine:
- Monday, June 22, 2009: Market-Based Reforms at Safeway by Paul Hsieh, MD
- Tuesday, June 23, 2009: The Unfree Market in Health Care by Paul Hsieh, MD
- Wednesday, June 24, 2009: Will on the Public Option by Paul Hsieh, MD
- Thursday, June 25, 2009: Armstrong: Reject Political Control Of Health Care by Paul Hsieh, MD
This week on FA/RM, the blog of Free Agriculture - Restore Markets:
Labels: FA/RM, Health Care
|
| |
E-mail Diana Hsieh
PermaLink ( )
Comments (New Page)
|
|
|
|  | |
Diana Hsieh
Paul Hsieh
Greg Perkins
Paula Hall
Guest NoodleFoodlers
Gina Liggett
Roderick Fitts
Brandon Byrd
Recent Comments
RSS Feed
Posts by E-Mail
NoodleFoodlers
Archives Ask a Question
Blogger Trackbacks
Technorati Trackbacks
Reader Map
OActivists E-mail List
OBloggers E-mail List
OAcademics E-mail List
Ayn Rand Lexicon
False Objectivism Collection
The Objective Standard
The Undercurrent
Ayn Rand Institute
Ayn Rand Society
DC Objectivist Salon
Front Range Objectivism
Coalition for Secular Government
Vote No on 48
Vote No on 59
Repeal the Bailout
EPA Ruination
FIRM (Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine)
Diana's NetFlix Friends
Paul Hsieh's GeekPress
Meredith Brickell Ceramics
The Balboa Experiment
GeekPress
Politics without God
We Stand FIRM
Principles in Practice
The Undercurrent
Randex
Capitalism Magazine
Daily Improvisation
Flibbertigibbet
Gus Van Horn
Rule of Reason
Ari Armstrong
Free Colorado
Rational Jenn
Ms. Think
Spark A Synapse
The New Clarion
Titanic Deck Chairs
The Crucible
The Morality War
Volokh Conspiracy
TheAgitator.com
Marginal Revolution
Little Green Footballs
Instapundit.com
Michael Eades
Free the Animal
Whole Health Source
Modern Forager
Mark's Daily Apple
Heart Scan
Art De Vany
IF Life
Fitness Fixation
Fitness Spotlight
CrossFit
Valhalla CrossFit
My Paleo Kitchen
Go Frolic
Artsy-Foodie
TUAW
Mac Gems
Mac OS X Tips
O'Reilly Mac Blog
Go Fug Yourself
waiterrant.net
Overheard at College
Overheard in New York
Whedonesque
Thrutch
The Hoondat Report
The Little Things
Myrhaf
Kindredist
Try Reason!
Mike's Eyes
Travels with Daisy
Jamie's Travel Log
Patient Power
Software Nerd
One Reality
3 Ring Binder
Valzhalla
Robbservations
Applying Philosophy
History At Our House
Non-Trivial Pursuit
TalkObjectivism
Shaving Leviathan
Classical Values
Principled Parent
Rational Passion
Objectivism Korea
Prometheus
Ping-Ponging...
Hand Waving...
Philosophical Mortician
The Canadian Republic
The Daily Layman
The Dirty Kuffar
Reddie Reasons
Philosopher Stone
Rhyme of the Day
Mudita Journal
Shawn Klein
Witch Doctor Repellent
Benevolent Misanthropy
Truth, Justice...
Making Progress
The Edge of Reason
Galileo Blogs
Aesthetic Capitalist
Optional Values
Individualist Outlook
Born to Identify
Erosophia
Haight Speech
Pedagogically Correct
Leitmotif
Personal Development
Ad Hoc
Alexander Marriott
The American Individualist
Armchair Intellectual
Secular Foxhole
Capitalist Lion
Literatrix
Wayne's Dirty Lab
Lyle's Blog
The Eleutherian Laureate
Wall of Separation
The Torch
Dynamist Blog
Deep Glamour
Fly Bottle
Tim Sandefur
Lifehacker
43 Folders
Daytipper
3 Things Today
LifeHack
DIY Life
Steve Pavlina
Tom G Palmer
Liberty and Power
Positive Liberty
Daily Dish
EconLog
Katie Allison Granju
Tightly Wound
Cranky Professor
Discriminations
Joanne Jacobs
Leiter Reports
GTD in Academia
Wickens.ca
Stark Relief
Passing Thoughts
USS Clueless
Anger Management
Cox & Forkum
Semper Vigilo
Abandon Caution
Purr Se
Tom Rowland
American Individualist
peltz at hand
Francisco Gutierrez
PhilosopherEagle
noumenalself
Talking To Myself
Acid Free Paper
One Minute Case
Philosophical Detective
March 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009
|